Abstract Number:
2971
Submission Type:
Contributed Abstract
Contributed Abstract Type:
Paper
Participants:
Ying Jin (1), Dominik Rothenhaeusler (2)
Institutions:
(1) Stanford University, N/A, (2) N/A, N/A
Co-Author:
First Author:
Presenting Author:
Abstract Text:
Many researchers have identified distribution shift as a likely contributor to the reproducibility crisis in behavioral and biomedical sciences. The idea is that if treatment effects vary across individual characteristics and experimental contexts, then studies conducted in different populations will estimate different average effects. This paper uses ``generalizability" methods to quantify how much of the effect size discrepancy between an original study and its replication can be explained by distribution shift on observed unit-level characteristics. More specifically, we decompose this discrepancy into ``components" attributable to sampling variability (including publication bias), observable distribution shifts, and residual factors. We compute this decomposition for several directly-replicated behavioral science experiments and find little evidence that observable distribution shifts contribute appreciably to non-replicability. In some cases, this is because there is too much statistical noise. In other cases, there is strong evidence that controlling for additional moderators is necessary for reliable replication.
Keywords:
Replicability|Distribution shift|Treatment effect|Generalizability| |
Sponsors:
IMS
Tracks:
Statistics and Science
Can this be considered for alternate subtype?
No
Are you interested in volunteering to serve as a session chair?
Yes
I have read and understand that JSM participants must abide by the Participant Guidelines.
Yes
I understand that JSM participants must register and pay the appropriate registration fee by June 1, 2024. The registration fee is non-refundable.
I understand