Nonparametric understanding of parametric tests
Abstract Number:
3142
Submission Type:
Contributed Abstract
Contributed Abstract Type:
Paper
Participants:
Christian Hennig (1)
Institutions:
(1) Universita Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
First Author:
Presenting Author:
Abstract Text:
One argument against statistical tests, which have come under intense criticism recently, is that the null hypothesis is never true ("all models are wrong but some are useful"), and therefore it is not informative to reject it.
Given a (parametric) test, a general nonparametric space of distributions can be split up into distributions for which the rejection probability is either (a) smaller (or equal) or (b) larger than the nominal test level. These constitute the "effective null hypothesis" and "effective alternative" of the test. When tests are applied, normally there is an informal research hypothesis, which would be translated into a set of statistical models. This set can be called the "interpretative null hypothesis" (or "interpretative alternative" depending on how the test problem is formulated). Understanding whether a statistical test is appropriate in such a situation amounts to understanding how the effective hypotheses relate to the interpretative hypotheses. This is essentially different from the question whether the test's model assumptions hold, which is not required to apply it.
Keywords:
Foundations of statistics|Frequentism|Statistical tests| | |
Sponsors:
International Statistical Institute
Tracks:
Miscellaneous
Can this be considered for alternate subtype?
No
Are you interested in volunteering to serve as a session chair?
No
I have read and understand that JSM participants must abide by the Participant Guidelines.
Yes
I understand that JSM participants must register and pay the appropriate registration fee by June 1, 2024. The registration fee is non-refundable.
I understand
You have unsaved changes.