Print  Close

Are the Gospels & Acts Historical? A response to Gregor and Blais’ (2023) statistical analysis

Abstract Number:

3522 

Submission Type:

Contributed Abstract 

Contributed Abstract Type:

Paper 

Participants:

Jason Wilson (1)

Institutions:

(1) Biola University, N/A

First Author:

Jason Wilson  
Biola University

Presenting Author:

Jason Wilson  
Biola University

Abstract Text:

In September, 2023, the Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus published a paper by Gregor and Blais which concluded that the name frequencies in the Gospels & Acts had no better fit to the best historical database of 2100+ first century Palestine male Jewish names than a uniform distribution (i.e. the names were made up). Furthermore, they wrote, "our statistical analysis identifies some, albeit weak, evidence against [the historical] thesis." (Gregor, Kamil and Brian Blais; 2023; Is Name Popularity a Good Test of Historicity? A Statistical Evaluation of Richard Bauckham's Onomastic Argument; JSHJ; Brill; 21:171-202. DOI: 10.1163/17455197-BJA10023) We applaud Gregor and Blais' great contribution with their careful data curation and groundbreaking statistical analysis of ancient name frequency data. Unfortunately, however, there were some methodological flaws which we will address. More importantly, we will offer an independent statistical analysis of the Gospels & Acts name frequency data and show that it actually fits the historical database pretty well.

Keywords:

onomastics|historical name frequency data|Gospels and Acts|goodness-of-fit | |

Sponsors:

Section on Text Analysis

Tracks:

Miscellaneous

Can this be considered for alternate subtype?

Yes

Are you interested in volunteering to serve as a session chair?

No

I have read and understand that JSM participants must abide by the Participant Guidelines.

Yes

I understand that JSM participants must register and pay the appropriate registration fee by June 1, 2024. The registration fee is non-refundable.

I understand