Performance Guaranteed Confidence Sets of Ranks

Abstract Number:

3884 

Submission Type:

Contributed Abstract 

Contributed Abstract Type:

Poster 

Participants:

Onrina Chandra (1), Minge Xie (1)

Institutions:

(1) N/A, N/A

Co-Author:

Minge Xie  
N/A

First Author:

Onrina Chandra  
N/A

Presenting Author:

Onrina Chandra  
N/A

Abstract Text:

Ranks of institutes are often estimated based on estimates of certain latent features of the institutes,  and due to sample randomness it is of interest to quantify the uncertainty associated with the estimated ranks. This task is especially important in often-seen ``near tie'' situations in which the estimated latent features are not well separated among some of the institutes resulting in a nonignorable portion of wrongly ordered estimated ranks. Uncertainty quantification can help mitigate some of the issues and give us a fuller picture, but the task is very challenging  because the ranks are discrete parameters and the standard inference methods developed under regularity conditions do not apply. Bayesian methods are sensitive to prior choices while large sample-based methods do not work since the central limit theorem fail to hold for the estimated ranks. In this article, we propose a repro Samples Method to address this nontrivial irregular inference problem by developing a confidence set for the true rank of the institutes. The confidence set obtained has finite sample coverage guarantee and the method can handle difficult near tie cases. The effectiveness of the proposed de

Keywords:

Inference on discrete parameter space|Finite-sample performance guarantee|Discrete parameter space|irregular inference problem| |

Can this be considered for alternate subtype?

No

Are you interested in volunteering to serve as a session chair?

No

I have read and understand that JSM participants must abide by the Participant Guidelines.

Yes

I understand that JSM participants must register and pay the appropriate registration fee by June 1, 2024. The registration fee is non-refundable.

I understand