Integrating RCT and External Control Data Using Balancing Weights; A Comparison of Estimands and Estimators

Laine Thomas Speaker
Duke University
 
Thursday, Aug 8: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM
Topic-Contributed Paper Session 
Oregon Convention Center 
Randomized controlled trials augmented by external controls involve two distinct sampling processes. First, the clinical trial or intervention arm is sampled from a population defined by the clinical and operational characteristics of the study design, such as the enrollment period, choice of enrolling sites, site enrollment rate, trial inclusion criteria, and patient consent. Second, an external control data set arises from a distinct sampling process. When samples from these two populations are combined for analysis, the covariate distributions are mixed. The mixing proportion may be proportional to the contributing sample sizes or dependent on the choice of balancing weights, thus giving rise to different target populations. We define relevant estimands for studies that augment clinical trials with real-world data using balancing weights. We highlight the advantages and disadvantages of different estimands with respect to interpretation. Finally, we compare alternative estimators through simulation and in application to an augmented clinical trial of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.