Handling Missing Outcome Data in Cluster Randomized Trials with Both Individual and Cluster Dropout

Beth Glenn Co-Author
UCLA
 
Roshan Bastani Co-Author
UCLA
 
Catherine Crespi Co-Author
University of California Los Angeles, Department of Biostatistics
 
Analissa Avila First Author
UCLA
 
Analissa Avila Presenting Author
UCLA
 
Monday, Aug 5: 9:20 AM - 9:35 AM
1876 
Contributed Papers 
Oregon Convention Center 
Missing outcome data are common in cluster randomized trials (CRTs) and can occur due to dropout of individuals, termed "sporadically" missing data, or dropout of clusters, termed "systematically" missing data. Multilevel multiple imputation (MI) methods that handle hierarchical data have been developed. However, application of these methods to CRTs is limited. We examined the performance of four multilevel multiple imputation (MI) methods to handle sporadically and systematically missing CRT outcome data via a simulation study. Our findings showed that one multilevel MI method outperformed the others under various scenarios. Using the best performing MI method, we developed methods for conducting sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of inferences under different missing not at random (MNAR) assumptions. The methods allow for different MNAR assumptions for cluster dropout and individual dropout to reflect that they may arise from different missing data mechanisms. Our methods are illustrated using a real data application. The findings lead to recommendations of approaches for handling missingness in cluster randomized trials.

Keywords

clustered data

missing data

MNAR

multiple imputation

systematically missing 

Main Sponsor

Biometrics Section