25 Assessing the mortality risk in the presence of immortal time bias by emulating trials
Anna Novelli
Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Mengnan Zhou
Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
John Chang
Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
John Sim
Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Jaejin An
Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Tuesday, Aug 6: 10:30 AM - 12:20 PM
3449
Contributed Posters
Oregon Convention Center
Immortal time bias is a significant issue when evaluating treatment effectiveness to inform health policy and decision making in observational studies. It is common in time-to-event drug effectiveness analyses where an index date is not clear. For example, when a treatment is being compared to no treatment or a continuation of treatment. In this case, participants are assigned to groups based on data collected after the cohort entry date. Traditional methods to avoid or minimize such bias include landmark analyses with a predefined follow-up start. More recently, clinical trial emulation analyses with the clone-censor-weight approach were proposed. We performed per-protocol trial emulation analyses with and without clones, and a 3-month landmark analysis, on the mortality risk at 9 months comparing intensification vs continuation of antihypertensive treatment in 65,631 eligible patients with chronic kidney disease and high blood pressure using electronic health records from an integrated health system. We found that the results differ between approaches. The results highlight the importance of selecting the proper methods to address immortal time bias.
Immortal time bias
Emulating Trials
clones
landmark analyses
Main Sponsor
Section on Statistics in Epidemiology
You have unsaved changes.