25 Assessing the mortality risk in the presence of immortal time bias by emulating trials

Anna Novelli Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
 
Mengnan Zhou Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
 
John Chang Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
 
John Sim Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
 
Maria Montez-Rath Co-Author
Stanford University
 
Michelle C. Odden Co-Author
Stanford University, School of Medicine
 
Vivek Charu Co-Author
 
Manjula Tamura Co-Author
Stanford University
 
Jaejin An Co-Author
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
 
Fang Niu First Author
 
Fang Niu Presenting Author
 
Tuesday, Aug 6: 10:30 AM - 12:20 PM
3449 
Contributed Posters 
Oregon Convention Center 
Immortal time bias is a significant issue when evaluating treatment effectiveness to inform health policy and decision making in observational studies. It is common in time-to-event drug effectiveness analyses where an index date is not clear. For example, when a treatment is being compared to no treatment or a continuation of treatment. In this case, participants are assigned to groups based on data collected after the cohort entry date. Traditional methods to avoid or minimize such bias include landmark analyses with a predefined follow-up start. More recently, clinical trial emulation analyses with the clone-censor-weight approach were proposed. We performed per-protocol trial emulation analyses with and without clones, and a 3-month landmark analysis, on the mortality risk at 9 months comparing intensification vs continuation of antihypertensive treatment in 65,631 eligible patients with chronic kidney disease and high blood pressure using electronic health records from an integrated health system. We found that the results differ between approaches. The results highlight the importance of selecting the proper methods to address immortal time bias.

Keywords

Immortal time bias

Emulating Trials

clones

landmark analyses 

Abstracts


Main Sponsor

Section on Statistics in Epidemiology