From Estimands to Robust Inference of Treatment Effects in Platform Trials

Yifan Yi Co-Author
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
 
Jun Shao Co-Author
University of Wisconsin
 
Yanyao Yi Co-Author
Eli Lilly and Company
 
Gregory Levin Co-Author
FDA
 
Nicole Hamblett Co-Author
Children's Hospital
 
patrick heagerty Co-Author
University of Washington
 
Ting Ye Co-Author
University of Washington
 
Yuhan Qian First Author
University of Washington
 
Yuhan Qian Presenting Author
University of Washington
 
Wednesday, Aug 6: 11:25 AM - 11:35 AM
1331 
Contributed Papers 
Music City Center 
A platform trial is an innovative clinical trial design that uses a master protocol (i.e., one overarching protocol) to evaluate multiple treatments, where patients are often assigned to different subsets of treatment arms based on individual characteristics, enrollment timing, and treatment availability. While offering increased flexibility, this constrained and non-uniform treatment assignment poses inferential challenges, with two fundamental ones being the precise definition of treatment effects and robust, efficient inference on these effects. Such challenges arise primarily because some commonly used analysis approaches may target estimands defined on populations inadvertently depending on randomization ratios or trial operation format, thereby undermining interpretability. This article, for the first time, presents a formal framework for constructing a clinically meaningful estimand with precise specification of the population of interest. Specifically, the proposed entire concurrently eligible (ECE) population not only preserves the integrity of randomized comparisons but also remains invariant to both the randomization ratio and trial operation format. Then, we develop weighting and post-stratification methods to estimate treatment effects under the same minimal assumptions used in traditional randomized trials. We also consider model-assisted covariate adjustment to fully unlock the efficiency potential of platform trials while maintaining robustness against model misspecification. For all proposed estimators, we derive asymptotic distributions, propose robust variance estimators, and compare them in theory and through simulations. The SIMPLIFY trial, a master protocol assessing the continuation versus discontinuation of two common therapies in cystic fibrosis, is utilized to further highlight the practical significance of this research. All analyses are conducted using the R package RobinCID.

Keywords

Concurrently eligible individuals

Covariate adjustment

Estimand

Inverse probability weighting

Master protocols

Relative efficiency 

Main Sponsor

Biopharmaceutical Section