WITHDRAWN Double Robust Variance Estimation with Parametric Working Models

Paul Zivich Co-Author
 
Chanhwa Lee Co-Author
 
Keyi Xue Co-Author
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
 
Rachael Ross Co-Author
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
 
Jessie Edwards Co-Author
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
 
Jeffrey Stringer Co-Author
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
 
Stephen Cole Co-Author
University of North Carolina
 
Bonnie Shook-Sa First Author
UNC Chapel Hill
 
Tuesday, Aug 5: 9:20 AM - 9:35 AM
0824 
Contributed Papers 
Music City Center 
Doubly robust estimators have gained popularity in the field of causal inference due to their ability to provide consistent point estimates when either an outcome or exposure model is correctly specified. However, for nonrandomized exposures the influence function based variance estimator frequently used with doubly robust estimators of the average causal effect is only consistent when both working models (i.e., outcome and exposure models) are correctly specified. In this presentation, the empirical sandwich variance estimator and the nonparametric bootstrap are demonstrated to be doubly robust variance estimators. That is, they are expected to provide valid estimates of the variance leading to nominal confidence interval coverage when only one working model is correctly specified. Simulation studies illustrate the properties of the influence function based, empirical sandwich, and nonparametric bootstrap variance estimators in the setting where parametric working models are assumed. Estimators are applied to data from the Improving Pregnancy Outcomes with Progesterone (IPOP) study to estimate the effect of maternal anemia on birth weight among women with HIV.

Keywords

augmented inverse probability weighting

causal inference

double robustness

empirical sandwich variance

M-estimation 

Main Sponsor

Section on Statistics in Epidemiology