Inspection-Guided Randomization: A Flexible and Transparent Restricted Randomization Framework

René Kizilcec Co-Author
Cornell University
 
Michael Baiocchi Co-Author
Stanford University
 
Maggie Wang First Author
Stanford University
 
Maggie Wang Presenting Author
Stanford University
 
Monday, Aug 4: 2:50 PM - 3:05 PM
2336 
Contributed Papers 
Music City Center 
Randomized experiments are considered the gold standard for estimating causal effects. However, out of the set of possible randomized assignments, some may be likely to produce poor effect estimates and misleading conclusions. Restricted randomization is an experimental design strategy that filters out undesirable treatment assignments, but its application has primarily been limited to ensuring covariate balance in two-arm studies where the target estimand is the average treatment effect. We introduce Inspection-Guided Randomization (IGR), a transparent and flexible framework for restricted randomization that filters out undesirable treatment assignments by inspecting assignments against analyst-specified, domain-informed design desiderata. In IGR, the acceptable treatment assignments are locked in ex ante and pre-registered in the trial protocol, thus safeguarding against p-hacking and promoting reproducibility. Through illustrative simulation studies motivated by behavioral health and education interventions, we demonstrate how IGR can be used to improve effect estimates compared to benchmark designs in experiments with interference and in group formation experiments.

Keywords

Causal inference

Experimental design

Reproducibility

Interference

Social context 

Main Sponsor

Section on Statistics in Epidemiology