51: Development and Evaluation of a Contrastive Learning Framework for Forensic Source Identification

Danica Ommen Co-Author
Iowa State University
 
Christopher Saunders Co-Author
South Dakota State University
 
JoAnn Buscaglia Co-Author
Federal Bureau of Investigation
 
Samuel Fox First Author
Iowa State University
 
Samuel Fox Presenting Author
Iowa State University
 
Wednesday, Aug 6: 10:30 AM - 12:20 PM
2779 
Contributed Posters 
Music City Center 
To interpret the value of forensic evidence resulting from paired item data, the common source identification framework asks: do the items share a common unknown source or come from two different unknown sources? This question can be addressed using a variety of forensic statistics techniques, including the usual Two-Stage, Likelihood Ratio, and Bayes Factor approaches. Contrastive learning methods address the question using two major components: a method for quantifying the similarity (or dissimilarity) of pairs of evidence items, and a method for determining the best separation of within-source or between-source comparisons. Contrastive learning methods are particularly useful when the data derived from the evidence is high-dimensional or complex. In this case, the contrastive learning algorithms take advantage of high-performing artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to avoid specifying complicated probability models for the usual forensic statistics approaches. In this presentation, a contrastive learning algorithm framework is developed for complex evidence and applied to data from aluminum powder particles recovered from two pre-blast improvised explosive devices.

Keywords

machine learning

explosives

likelihood ratio

scores

ROC curve

density estimation 

Main Sponsor

Section on Statistics in Defense and National Security