Comparing Two Categorical Gini Correlations with Applications to Classification Problems

3739 

Contributed Abstract 

Paper 

Sameera Hewage (1), Yongli Sang (1)

(1) University of Louisiana at Lafayette, N/A

Yongli Sang  
University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Sameera Hewage  
University of Louisiana at Lafayette

We introduce a general inferential framework for comparing predictor importance in classification models with categorical responses. Our approach is based on the categorical Gini correlation (CGC), a dependence measure between numerical and categorical variables that captures the significance of a predictor for the response. To compare the importance of two predictors with respect to the same categorical outcome, we conduct hypothesis tests on their CGCs. The framework accommodates predictors of arbitrary and unequal dimensionalities. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic for hypothesis testing and show that the test is consistent. In addition, we propose a nonparametric bootstrap procedure as an alternative to the asymptotic normal-based test. Simulation studies demonstrate the empirical performance of the proposed tests, and applications to two real datasets illustrate their practical utility.

categorical Gini correlation|comparing correlations|classification|Predictor importance|Categorical response|Nonparametric bootstrap

Section on Statistical Learning and Data Science

Variable Selection